Build the Preliminary Ecological Appraisal report shell and tidy its standard sections from your own text, leaving every judgement section blank
A Preliminary Ecological Appraisal (PEA) follows much the same section order from job to job, and one ecologist’s job profile says she spends much of the winter writing reports. The fixed parts (contents, document control, abbreviations, appendix list, table layouts and your own standard methods and limitations paragraphs) take time but need no ecological judgement. AI can build that shell and tidy your own wording. The habitat descriptions, protected-species assessment, impacts and recommendations stay blank for you or your named ecologist to write, and no species records or locations go into the AI tool.
Steps
- Open a previous appraisal you are happy with and save a copy. Delete the client, landowner, site address, grid references, maps, species records and every site-specific sentence. What is left is your headings plus any standard wording you reuse.
- List the headings in the prompt and mark each one: AI MAY TIDY (contents page, document control table, abbreviations, appendix list, figure and table captions, your own standard methods and limitations paragraphs) or ECOLOGIST ONLY (habitat descriptions, protected-species assessment, impacts, constraints, recommendations, further surveys, mitigation).
- Run the prompt. The AI returns the shell with the tidy sections reworded for clarity only and each ecologist-only section left as a heading with [ECOLOGIST TO WRITE] under it, plus table layouts with column headings and empty rows.
- Fill the shell outside the AI tool from your own field notes and records. If you want help tidying a judgement section afterwards, paste only text with no locations or species detail, and never ask the AI to add content.
- Before issue, run the report through your quality check (job 10): self check, factual check by someone competent, then approval. Update the standard sections for this job: survey date, weather, access limits and anything the shell cannot know.
The exact prompt
I work for a small ecological consultancy in the UK. I need a report shell for a Preliminary Ecological Appraisal (PEA). Below are my own headings, each marked AI MAY TIDY or ECOLOGIST ONLY, and my own standard paragraphs for the tidy sections. Task: (1) return the full shell in heading order; (2) for every AI MAY TIDY heading, return my text lightly reworded for clarity only, with the same meaning, and do not add any fact, method, standard, species, law or guidance that I have not written; (3) for every ECOLOGIST ONLY heading, return the heading followed by [ECOLOGIST TO WRITE] and nothing else; (4) add table layouts for a document control table, a survey details table (date, surveyor, weather, access limits as empty columns) and an appendix list, with empty rows; (5) mark any place where my standard text mentions a date, version or rule that may need updating with [CHECK THIS IS CURRENT]. RULES FOR THIS CHAT: I will give you only my own text, headings, dates and figures that I have typed in. I have not included, and will not include, any client or landowner name, address, email or phone number, any site address, grid reference or map, any species location (the position of a roost, sett, nest, pond, record or survey point), or any other confidential detail about a site, client or landowner. Use the blanks [CLIENT], [LANDOWNER], [SITE] and [SPECIES LOCATION]. Do not ask for them and do not invent any. You must not give or suggest any ecological judgement: no view on whether a species or habitat is present, its value or condition, any impact or mitigation, whether a survey or licence is needed or adequate, whether survey data is in date, whether a site is exempt from biodiversity net gain, or whether anything is compliant, lawful or ready to sign off. Do not do arithmetic, count dates or work out areas: copy every figure and date exactly as I typed it. Where a judgement is needed, write [FOR THE ECOLOGIST TO DECIDE]. Everything you write is a draft that a named ecologist will check. MY HEADINGS AND MARKS: [PASTE] MY STANDARD PARAGRAPHS FOR THE TIDY SECTIONS: [PASTE]
✓ Check before you send
- No sentence in an ECOLOGIST ONLY section was written by the AI; each one is still [ECOLOGIST TO WRITE] until a person writes it.
- Your standard methods and limitations paragraphs still say what you actually did on this site (survey date, weather, access limits); the shell cannot know, so read each line against your field notes.
- No client name, site name or species wording from the old report is left in the shell, headers, footers, file properties or table captions.
- No grid reference, map or species location went into the AI tool, and the shell was built from headings and standard text only.
- A named ecologist with the right competence has read the finished report before it goes to the client, and any protected-species content has had its own professional check.
UK notes extra
- UK: a PEA is a professional document, not a statutory form, so the sections are your own practice and your client’s brief. The AI must not add legal or guidance references that you have not written.
- CIEEM’s report-writing guidance (UK-wide, December 2017) sets out a quality assurance protocol of a self check, a factual check by an appropriate checker, and an approval. CIEEM: Guidelines for Ecological Report Writing (PDF, December 2017; UK-wide).
- CIEEM’s webinar page says the webinar will explain the advice note’s core principles, including human oversight and professional accountability; the note itself is for CIEEM members, so this page has not summarised it. CIEEM: webinar page for the Responsible Use of Artificial Intelligence in Ecology and Environmental Management Good Practice Advice Note (the note itself is a members’ resource; the page names its principles).
- Data protection: if a report includes personal data about a landowner or client, UK GDPR still applies to what you put into an AI tool; the ICO publishes guidance on AI and data protection. ICO: guidance on AI and data protection (UK).
- Biodiversity net gain wording is England only; if a report is for Wales, Scotland or Northern Ireland, use that nation’s planning policy and leave BNG text out unless the planning authority asks for it.